Medical Marijuana Advocates Making Strides as Supreme Court Ponders a Ruling

Categories: Marijuana

According to campaign-finance reports for November, lawyer and pro-medical marijuana advocate John Morgan has put more than $500 grand into the People United for Medical Marijuana campaign.

All told, he's put in about $972,125, bringing this thing almost to a cool million.

Meanwhile, United for Care is launching its "day of action" this weekend, looking to collect more signatures from Floridians, all while the Florida Supreme Court ponders the language in the ballot and whether to allow the state to choose if medical marijuana should be legalized.

See also: Medical Marijuana Petitions Head to Supreme Court

On Thursday, United for Care sent an email to supporters and volunteers, announcing its plan to rally together on Saturday to help collect more signatures as a deadline looms.

United for Care is hitting the streets in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach -- as well as Miami, Orlando, Naples, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Deland -- to collect petitions.

In total, the group needs 683,149 John Hancocks to be able to have a proposal on the November ballot.

According to campaign manager Ben Pollara, the group has collected about 600,000 signatures so far.

With the holidays looming, the group is stepping up its efforts this weekend with a goal of collecting 90,000 signatures.

The campaign is sponsored by Morgan, a big-time Democratic fundraiser and Charlie Crist backer.

Morgan has also been bombarding the state with ads talking up the benefits of medical marijuana. His father and brother had suffered from cancer and injuries and found relief in marijuana for medicinal purposes. So Morgan's push is a personal one.

Meanwhile, the group is receiving pushback from the usual suspects in government.

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi has been looking for a way to derail the movement as the petition heads to the Florida Supreme Court.

Back in October, Bondi wrote that "if the amendment passed, Florida law would allow marijuana in limitless situations." Any physician could approve marijuana for seemingly any reason to seemingly any person (of any age) -- including those without any "debilitating disease."

This is the same Bondi who has been on a quest to have a federal court strike down a law that prohibits the sale of handguns by federally licensed dealers to people aged 18 through 20.

This is what the Florida Supreme Court is ruling on: the language. And that is pretty much what is deciding the fate of Floridians who could seriously benefit from medical marijuana.

United for Care simply wants to give voters the choice. Its fight is to have the people decide in November if medical pot should be legal in Florida.

The latest poll showed that 70 percent of Floridians would say yes to that.

The Supreme Court has until April 1 to make its ruling.

Send your story tips to the author, Chris Joseph.

Follow Chris Joseph on Twitter

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

I first tried marijuana when I was 21 years old. Now, 46 years later, I still smoke pot.

I am 67 years old and have not taken a prescription medication in over 30 years. Has regular cannabis use enabled this?  I have no idea.

I am active...hiking, canoeing, camping, bicycling. My last hike was 11.5 the Confluence Overlook in Canyonlands Natl Park.  Has cannabis enabled this?  I don't know.

I do know that I am living proof that prohibitionist propaganda is a fallacy...a blatant lie.

The worst experience I ever had with cannabis was spending 5 years in Federal Prison for a marijuana offense.

I wrote about the escapades that led to my imprisonment. The book:

‘Shoulda Robbed a Bank’…

It’s on Amazon…true story…by Hugh Yonn


The study that was conducted from 1970-74 (outside the country) at the University of Ontario didn't quite turn out as expected. The DEA sponsored the study to defame marijuana but it actually proved that marijuana cured several types of cancer; Not happy with the results of the study, the DEA surprised the evidence. It's a wonderful world we live in where there's been a known cure for cancer since the 70's but the evidence has been suppressed by our own government...

knowa1 topcommenter

None of this would be necessary if not for this. 

On August 14, 1970, the Assistant Secretary of Health, Dr. Roger O. Egeberg wrote a letter recommending the plant, marijuana, be classified as a schedule 1 substance, and it has remained that way for nearly 45 years. My research started with a careful reading of that decades old letter. What I found was unsettling. Egeberg had carefully chosen his words:

"Since there is still a considerable void in our knowledge of the plant and effects of the active drug contained in it, our recommendation is that marijuana be retained within schedule 1 at least until the completion of certain studies now underway to resolve the issue."

Not because of sound science, but because of its absence, marijuana was classified as a schedule 1 substance. Again, the year was 1970. Egeberg mentions studies that are underway, but many were never completed. As my investigation continued, however, I realized Egeberg did in fact have important research already available to him, some of it from more than 25 years earlier.


@knowa1 Yes, nice refresher and I got a B+ on my report about it in tenth grade back in 1973.

Now Trending

Miami Concert Tickets

From the Vault