Proposed Law: Sex Offenders on Probation Shouldn't Be Allowed to Look at Porn

Categories: Crime

katie_edwards.jpg
Rep. Katie Edwards
A Republican state senator from Lakeland, Sen. Kelli Stargel, and a Democratic state rep from here in Plantation, Katie Edwards, cosponsored legislation Wednesday that would try to keep sex offenders who are on probation from accessing pornography.

Edwards says her bill was the result of a Sun Sentinel article about reoffenders. "I had spoken to Sen. Stargel," Edwards told New Times, "... and we said what are some loopholes, some small bites of the apple that we can [address practically]?" She said Stargel's husband is a judge and helped them come up with the proposed law.

She says that the criminal justice subcommittee is exploring ways for sex offenders to make a "lifetime commitment to stop offending" and that "the bipartisan wherewithal is there" to pass legislation.

Her proposed law would place "a prohibition on viewing, accessing, owning, or possessing any obscene, pornographic, or sexually stimulating visual or auditory material, including telephone, electronic media, computer programs, or computer services."

Edwards did not get into specifics about how it might be enforced. (Imagine the legal debates about whether a picture or telephone conversation was/ wasn't "stimulating"!)

Stangel was quoted as saying:

"Pornography is a catalyst to a range of sexual offenses in our culture. This bill is common-sense legislation. Currently, a sex offender can view pornography if it is not relevant to their sexual offense. I believe it is in the best interest of the offender and the public that all pornography is prohibited to sexual offenders, regardless of the person's prior deviant behavior. I am proud to sponsor legislation with Representative Edwards which works toward a safer Florida for all citizens."

This 2007 exploration of whether porn triggers sex offenses found that the opposite was true: As internet porn exploded, rapes decreased.

Edwards said she didn't have data to support her position, but she thought Stargel did.

Courts have been challenged on pornography, sometimes ruling that legislating it amounts to creating a "thought crime."

"I welcome anybody who has concerns about how civil liberties might be impacted" to join the debate, Edwards said, and to "talk to the families that have been impacted by sexual abuse. There needs to be a balance. The public has a right to be free from sexual abuse and molestation. All our bill would be doing is making sure we're not limiting judges... The effect of pornography could have a stimulating effect that would prompt someone to fall off the wagon." She compared it to alcoholics having a cocktail.





Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
shukhsh
shukhsh

My husband's not good in bed. He is lazy and his thing is too small for me.

commenter8
commenter8 topcommenter

An incredibly stupid idea. How do clowns like these two get elected?!?

Eliza45
Eliza45

<!--my best friend's sister makes $83 an hour on the internet. She has been out of a job for 5 months but last month her pay was $15927 just working on the internet for a few hours. here are the findings................................ Buzz55.ℂom......-->

smdrpepper
smdrpepper

Yeah theres a great idea, make sure the sex offender has no release AT ALL!!  That wont blow up in anyones face...

Dan K. Alexander
Dan K. Alexander

This is retarded. If we're talking about harm reduction, it would make more sense to let sex offenders find release through pornography than it would be to have them pent up those inclinations to the point where they are more likely to be manifested in an offensive way. Case in point, there are so many pedophile Catholic priests simply because there is no outlet - like porn or marriage - for those men to find sexual release. When will we be required to base laws upon science and research instead of what merely sounds good or applies to religious dogma?

Now Trending

Miami Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Loading...