Chick-fil-A Stadium: FAU Considered Homophobic Firm

Categories: Broward News
fireant_small.jpg
There's the sublime. There's the ridiculous. And there's the sublimely ridiculous. If former FAU Athletics Director Craig Angelos is to believed, the last of those three is the realm inhabited by the school's leadership, as far as PR savvy.

The school's tone-deaf ways have been infamous from coast to coast for the past two months, ever since its decision to sell naming rights of its football field to the world's largest private prison operator, the GEO Group. But the frosting on the cake? According to Angelos, the other chief candidate for the deal was... Chick-fil-A. That's right: Instead of branding the school's signature building with the name of a notorious human rights abuser, it could have been linked forever with efforts to beat back equality for gays and lesbians. Go Owls!

Angelos disclosed this info in an interview with Sunshine State News, a right-wing web pub spawned by GOP political operative Justin Sayfie. (We're regular readers. Like the Godfather says: "Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.") According to Angelos, who reportedly was dismissed for faltering fundraising:

Angelos says he had a superior stadium-rights deal on the table, before the first football game was ever played, involving one of South Florida's largest car dealership chains. That arrangement could have put $1 million of annual advertising money and straight-up sponsor gifts into the program each year for six years. But, he says, the higher-ups in the school's chain of command wanted to hold off for a better deal with fast-food chain Chick-fil-A or, indeed, the GEO Group. After being put on hold, the automotive chain's interest cooled, and FAU ultimately landed GEO...

OK. GEO is local, hq'd just down the road from the school in Boca Raton, and its CEO is a longtime school trustee. So that lends a microscopically slim excuse for the school's disastrous choice. But Chick-fil-A is based in Atlanta, and the only prior connection to FAU (known to us, anyway) is the sale of its sandwiches at the stadium. (We'll have the lobster quesadilla, ourselves.)

It's also the case that Chick-fil-A's gay-bashing ways drew widespread attention only after its CEO mouthed off about how fire and brimstone will rain down on the U.S. if gay marriage was allowed. That was in June 2012, after Angelos was let go by FAU. But due diligence by the school would have turned up news reports of the company's antigay stance as far back as January 2011. As the GEO Group disaster shows, however, due diligence is not FAU's strong suit.

We've asked FAU's media relation's folks for response to Angelos' comments and to tell us how accurate his account is. (Maybe he's fibbing, to get back at the school, or pulling the traditional-values leg of Sunshine State News.) We've yet to hear back.




Advertisement

My Voice Nation Help
5 comments
licentiousnessharms
licentiousnessharms

Same-sex marriage is an injustice, a tyrannical ploy being perpetrated upon our society, the pernicious consequences of which are simply mocked and laughed at by its supporters. Ignorance and prejudice have taken the place of knowledge and reason. Caprice and passion substituted for prudence and virtue. The happiness of society, the good of all families, and the welfare of mankind fall victim to the injustice of selfish love, which calculates every thing for itself while taking no notice of a child's best interest or the public advantage of a government promoting ONLY the traditional family unit. 


Same-sex marriage is antithetical to the Rule of Law, for the principle object of laws in general is to correct bad inclinations, to prevent vicious habits, to hinder their effects, and to eradicate the passions; or at least to contain them within proper limits. Same-sex marriage makes an implicit statement that mothers and fathers are interchangeable, and that sex is irrelevant to parenting. Once same-sex marriage becomes legally and socially acceptable, more women will decide to raise children together. Teen aged boys without fathers are at risk for juvenile delinquency, violence, criminal activity, gang membership, and incarceration. Teen aged girls without fathers are at risk for early sexual activity, multiple sex partners, out of wedlock pregnancies, and sexually transmitted disease.


Same-sex marriage is perfectly contrary to the principle of marriage, having more resemblance to divorce and adultery, same-sex marriage purposely separates a child from at least one biological parent, thereby creating broken homes, not as a matter of extraordinary circumstances, but as routine. Same-sex marriage proponents callously ignore a child's Natural Right to know, and be raised by, both biological parents, and make the most preposterous and pretentious claim that marriage was instituted by civil society primarily for the benefit of any two loving adults. Take away Natural Laws, and that moral tie which supports justice and honesty in a whole nation and establishes also particular duties in families, or in other relations of life; and man becomes the most savage and ferocious of all animals,licentiousness becomes the consequence of independence. 


After what has been said, let us be satisfied with observing, that the fitness in favor of the sanction of traditional marriage, is so much stronger and more pressing, as same-sex marriage throws into the system of humanity an obscurity and confusion, which borders on very much upon the absurd, if it does not come quite close up to it. There is, certainly, no comparison between traditional marriage and same-sex marriage, in respect to beauty and fitness; the first is a work of the most perfect reason; the second is defective, and provides no manner of remedy against a great many disorders. Now even this alone points out sufficiently on which side the truth lies and to reject this thought leads us insensibly to a kind of pyrrhonism, which would also be a subversion of the Rule of Law and social order.


Here are two truths regarding marriage: (1) A man creating a family with another man is not equal to creating a family with a woman, and (2) denying children parents of both genders at home is an objective evil. Kids need and yearn for both.


Children are not pets one purchases from rescue shelters(adoption clinics) and puppy mills(insemination and surrogacy). Children are human beings endowed with a natural desire to be procreated from an engendered act of love between a husband and a wife. Same-sex marriage is adulterous by nature and thereby destructive to not only children, but to our civilization. 


Same-sex marriage disregards the natural order of procreatory responsibility, not only confusing the natural disposition of parental authority; but undermining the legal principle that children have a right to a relationship with their biological parents, depriving a child access to their biological parent’s genetic, cultural and social heritage, not for extraordinary circumstances, but as a matter of routine. Same-sex marriage amounts to institutionalized adultery through a hostile takeover of civil society by the State. Children will no longer be entitled to their biological parents, as the transitory wants of same-sex adults will have taken precedence over a child’s best interest.


Same-sex marriage PURPOSELY separates a child from at least one biological parent. Non-biological parents lack the advantage of  consanguineous insight leaving them all too often ill-prepared to protect the child from unforeseen hazards. Left unrecognized and unattended, vicious habits, and irregular passions, obfuscate the mind; and neglect, levity, and prejudices of the ill-equipped non-biological parents precipitate a child into the grossest of errors, rendering the child's conduct a burden to the happiness of both society and the life of the child.


Same-sex marriage proponents demand “Marriage Equality”, yet, in return, they offer less-than-equal protection of the child’s happiness than can be afforded through the presence of both biological parents.


Same-sex marriage proponents profess that it is love which gives the right to join the institution of marriage, yet, in doing so, they selfishly violate the principle loving objective of this noble institution; to protect a child’s Natural Right to be raised by both biological parents.


In fine, same-sex marriage surmounts to nothing more than an unnatural extravagance which the supporters most ignorantly claim to be a “right”.


“No one has a right to do that which, if everybody did it, would destroy society.” ---Immanuel Kant 


Joe1
Joe1

So why doesn't NEW TIMES SPONSOR THE STADIUM?  


fire.ant
fire.ant topcommenter

@Joe1 We've offered to tell the world FAU stands for Fire Ant University.

Now Trending

Miami Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Services

General

Loading...