Michael McAuliffe's Record on Prosecuting Cops

mcaullifemugs.JPG
PBSO
Riviera cops Dodson and Schneider are awaiting trial.
The recent furor over Palm Beach State Attorney Michael McAuliffe's decision to drop felony charges against two former West Palm Beach cops brings to mind the prosecutor's other high-profile attempts to bust dirty cops. Considering his track record, one can understand why he might be gun-shy. 

In the West Palm case, two former police officers were accused of kicking and beating a handcuffed suspect. McAuliffe decided that case wasn't winnable. But in Riviera Beach, McAuliffe has labored for two years to prosecute three police officers for crimes that seem almost petty by comparison.

This January, after a bizarre trial that pitted cops against one another, Riviera Vice Agent John Toombs was acquitted of charges that he tipped off
a murder suspect about an arrest. Sgt. Michael Dodson is still facing allegations of falsely reporting a crime after getting drunk, firing his gun in his garage, and mutilating himself with a box cutter. A third officer, veteran Detective Lee Ann Schneider, is awaiting trial for one of the oldest tricks in the book -- allegedly helping a supervisor pad his overtime. Schneider faces multiple charges of forgery and official misconduct.

Yet her supervisor, Sgt. Patrick Galligan, has not been charged, and neither has any higher-ranking officer who may have known about the overtime arrangement. If McAuliffe was trying to root out corruption in a chaotic police department, how could he leave upper management unscathed?

Interestingly, it was a former Riviera Beach cop and friend of Galligan's, Rick Sessa, who filed a recent ethics complaint against McAuliffe. Sessa alleges that McAuliffe dropped misconduct charges in the West Palm Beach beating case because he was trying to win political support from the police union. But with McAuliffe's spotty track record of prosecuting cops, such support seems unlikely.
My Voice Nation Help
2 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Disagree
Disagree

This article is reaching. McAuliffe's record on bringing criminals to justice is clear. In the recent case involving 2 wpb police officers - there was not enough evidence to move forward with the case. A good State Attorney realizes you don't charge an individual with a crime you cannot prove happened or if the evidence does not support your claim.

Concerned Citizen
Concerned Citizen

I think Michael McAuliffe has done a good job during his tenure asState Attorney.  He prosecutes cases withactual evidence.  It doesn’t make senseto go after people without evidence of wrongdoing.  By prosecuting people he knows are in thewrong, we can be assured that they will not corrupt other individuals doingtheir jobs.  If the state prosecutedeveryone that “could have” been a part of the bad act it would be a tremendouswaste of time and resources.  

Now Trending

Miami Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Services

Loading...