Two Words: 'Beat Sharing'
I wrote recently about the plan among the major three dailies (somehow "major" just doesn't seem like the right word anymore) to share beat writers in the sports department. Well, the idea may be spreading to other departments. This just came across the Pulp's transom: "Hey, a heads up -- you ought to be looking at beat sharing agreements between the three papers. We're hearing that something is supposed to come out in the next week or so."
This is bad not only for local journalists -- more sharing means fewer jobs, of course -- but also for the newspapers themselves. They're already sharing content, which I think is a huge mistake and amounts to beat sharing. Here's an apropos note sent to me by former Sun-Sentinel copyeditor Allen Cone, who was laid off due to staff cuts:
On Saturday, the Sun-Sentinel ran a story written by the Post's Jane Musgrave about fake driver's licenses sold via DMV workers in Del Ray Beach. The story ran on the top of local cover in the Palm edition.On Monday, the Post ran the same story on 1A.I think what happened is that the story appeared on the Post's Web site Friday even though it wasn't to run until Monday. I know the Sun-Sentinel lately is putting some of its weekend copy on the site on Friday.
21 comment(s) / Post a Comment
Too bad for the Sun-Sentinel that they didn't have content sharing when the Post was putting all those county commissioners in jail!
In my many years in the business, that was a beat-down of epic proportions.
Posted On: Friday, Jun. 12 2009 @ 9:48AMThe Post reporter's reward for exposing all those commissioners was a pink slip. He was one of the first to go last summer.
Posted On: Friday, Jun. 12 2009 @ 10:19AMWhy don't they share management too? I don't see why Philip Ward's spinelessness should only be endured by the S-S newsroom: that seems selfish. Why can't he advise both the Post and Herald managers to wear beige, be quiet and sit in the back of the room.
Or Earl's little homilies -- trips across the bridge, the river, whatever. It just seems too greedy to deny other newsrooms that wisdom.
still hearing about a combined, very small photo squad for all three papers. Anyone hearing this too?
Posted On: Friday, Jun. 12 2009 @ 11:12AMAFDI - AS EASY AS HIGGS BOSON*
(*Another Think Piece from Your Chief Innovations Officer Himself)
Doesn't matter if you're talking beats or beets.
Either way, we gotta make the kind of tasty soup that people will pay good money to eat.
So let's put the toys away boys and girls because I'm here to tell you that if Sam is God and Randy’s Jesus, then I’m the Holy Ghost.
Which is how come I gotta cover all the bases – from radio, to television, to newspapers ALL AT ONCE to increase EVERYONE’S understanding of what needs to be understood as the demographics of the New Millennium Mainstream where everyone is hooked up and part of.
In other words, we can’t get stuck with a new vision of the same old crap by reinventing ourselves incrementally with last week’s STALE gumbo when a Hard Time Hurricane is blowing our way.
Or as my hero Marshall McLuhan once nailed it, “We look at the future through a rearview mirror.”
So NEW has to be JOB ONE!
Or, boiling it all down to the basics: The Creative’s conceived to reinvigorate our brand, amp our relevance, unify across initiatives and stimulate new trial.
Being rigid only works with a really hot woman.
While revolutions are all about “WE.”
And AFDI!
Which means you are either WITH the Revolution or AGAINST it. There is no middle ground. You will either embrace the Company and WIN, or the Company will BEAT you into the ground.
It’s all about Connection and Connectivity beyond utility and Utilization.
So if you are IN – cool – Bear down for Battle.
If you are OUT – cool – and good luck feeding your family at a soup kitchen.
FACT:
We need to make Imagineering an ACTION priority and not just talk.
It's like I keep telling the print people: We can't put new wine into an old wineskin.
Doesn't matter.
Newspapers are the worst when it comes to resisting the NEW as JOB ONE.
Probably because print people are rigid enough to put Viagra in Chapter 11.
Even though I keep telling them how in my Father’s house there are many mansions which is why we are news/information/entertainment/content company and not just a newspaper company.
So he who has eyes should see, and he who has ears should listen.
Because I am the way and truth, while you would know what to do with a doobie.
Evan worse, much of what many DO see with their eyes and hear with their ears are negative things that are NOT truly in the loop on the bigger forward looking, multi-platform picture playbook-wise.
The problem, of course, is that newspaper people are trapped in the 19th century. They’re THAT far away from the New Mainstream.
Like the entire newspaper culture is obsessed with its readers – instead of its audience.
But then print is TOTALLY left brain, which is why circulation is hurtling down the crapper.
How bad is it culture-wise with most newspapers?
Last week I met a reporter in Florida who acted like I was pissing on his leg when I told him a First Amendment and Free Press will never get some poor schmuck to shell out 75 cents for his paper.
So then I tried to explain how print people are gonna be walking dead men on the way to a soup kitchen until the learn how to AMPLIFY their outdated platform with MORE NOTICABILITY by promoting today’s COOL instead of yesterday’s HOT.
But the problem is that most of these print people fail to GROCK how the whole concept is TOTALLY immediate and non-linear like it has to be commitment-wise and McLuhan-wise.
And that we all need to go for the Cool by pushing the Hot Bottom to create environments that will maximize our multi-platform brands LIKE THAT BIG S that reaches out and touches … while we all keep on keeping on by pushing and pushing… against a sing-along choir of good old Ozzie Osbourne’s, “If you want to be a hero, well just follow me.”
Otherwise, as Our Father Sam who art in Chicago has said, “Fuck you!”
The "content sharing" of the big three has actually worked out to "beat sharing" when it comes to theatre. For a time, the Sun-Sentinel wasn't sending out its own reviewer at all, relying on reviews by the Post and Herald. The Herald has now started using Sentinel reviews instead of sending their own reviewer out.
The problem is that people who see theatre are looking for a variety of reviews of a show. Readers of the 21st century are already out on the web, we're already reading these other reviews. So when the Herald or Sentinel regurgitates something the other has already published, they offend their readers. "Screw you, no news for you!"
The only thing the managers of the big three dailies are doing effectively is ensuring their own demise.
Posted On: Friday, Jun. 12 2009 @ 8:24PMHey Captain, Dubocq didn't get a pink slip. If he wanted to stay, he could have stayed. He had plenty of friends in high places.
Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 13 2009 @ 6:37AMOh, Abe,that was so dead on, Abrams might actually appropriate it word for word, since he can't spell plagiarism and is too lazy to look it up. And GROCK, There's a generational divide. I love it!
Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 13 2009 @ 9:41AMJP is right. The success of a parody is when you can't tell it from the real thing (or in Lee's case, the unreal thing).
Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 13 2009 @ 11:17AMThat was a parody? It read like the garbage he sends out every week.
Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 13 2009 @ 12:50PMStanding O with a slow clap (and a bong hit) for Abe's post. Way to imagineer the drivel that passes for justification of a huge salary from a dimwit.
Posted On: Saturday, Jun. 13 2009 @ 2:29PMBeing slightly slow on the uptake, I was actually unsure whether this was a parody or the real thing for a while. That's how well it was done.
The sexual references and obscenity cleared it up, but even then ...
Posted On: Sunday, Jun. 14 2009 @ 11:01AMI can understand SOME of the concern about content/beat sharing, but if one of the three papers gets a good story of regional import, then all three should run it. The go-go 80s are over, folks. Remember when the Herald had bureaus up the coast like a string of pearls (or a string of anal beads)? Remember when the Sentinel actually beat the PB Post in its own backyard, regularly breaking south county stories? There's no real competition between the papers any more. It's too expensive and all three companies are bleeding out like monkeys with ebola.
"But content sharing will reduce competition and diminish the quality and quantity of coverage, etc, etc. "
Imagine how much more a reporter can get done without a harried assistant metro editor breathing down her neck for a say-nothing folo. This actually frees up the reporter to work on his or her own take without having to rehash the previous info.
And consider this: Do you ever actually need three separate game stories of an event? There are no new insights gained, no revelations, no national audience waiting for the dispatch from Army vs. Notre Dame. Send one reporter to the game as a pool writer and have the columnists do some heavy lifting for a change.
Fewer jobs? You betcha.
Posted On: Sunday, Jun. 14 2009 @ 11:17AMFormer Floridian - while I may not read 3 versions of game coverage, I do look for at least three reviews of performances; the outcome of a game is objective: you can report who won and who lost.
But art is subjective; there is no single interpretation of it. One critic's feast is another's famine. If you peruse some of the reviews I've collated at the South Florida Theatre Scene, you'll find that often three different reviews of the same play get you three completely different opinions.
If all you see is filling the pages for the next issue, then you're missing the larger picture. It's not always about simply getting the story: it's getting the best or most complete or most compelling version of the story. And that demands competition.
You don't win the race by dropping out. If the three dailies don't start competing with each other for stories, they will all three fail. And they will deserve to.
Posted On: Sunday, Jun. 14 2009 @ 12:45PMFar as I'm concerned, you add a few pin stripes to your buggy and you're gonna do a whole lot better when it comes to competing with those new fangled horseless carriages.
'N that's a gol darn fact!
"Remember when the Sentinel actually beat the PB Post in its own backyard, regularly breaking south county stories?"
No, because it happened so rarely. I used to work in that office, and what I remember is the editors reading the Post in the morning and typically asking, "How can we come back at this story?"
And in the case of one editor, the modus operandi was to ignore the scoop if possible -- or at least call it a "non story."
Posted On: Monday, Jun. 15 2009 @ 10:34AMCL Jahn said: Former Floridian - while I may not read 3 versions of game coverage, I do look for at least three reviews of performances; the outcome of a game is objective: you can report who won and who lost.
But art is subjective; there is no single interpretation of it. One critic's feast is another's famine. If you peruse some of the reviews I've collated at the South Florida Theatre Scene, you'll find that often three different reviews of the same play get you three completely different opinions."
Agreed that arts coverage is a different animal, which is the main reason I didn't use it as an example. But a city council meeting? A softball district semi-final? A feature on a 98-year-old tap dance instructor? Send one body, with a still camera that shoots video.
And slong those lines, most, if not all, South Florida arts writers need to be serious utility players. There's just not enough to cover in each paper's core circulation area. It's not a "target-rich environment" as they say in the military.
..and "Long Gone" -- I have to agree with some of you wrote. Best part of the day was figuring out how to do an end-run around your editor to actually do the story you believed should be done. It was a feint-and-parry dance of meetings, Atex messages, phone calls, and more meetings. Scary part is that some of those folks are still with the company.
Of course, Long Gone and Former Floridian, this wouldn't have happened if you hadn't had your asses kicked on so many stories. The editors were having to clean up after your lazy-ass ways.
Posted On: Monday, Jun. 15 2009 @ 5:51PMThe Sentinel had us outnumber 2 to 1 in South County and we beat them like a rented mule. Not to say, they didn't get in their shots. You dreaded the day when you walked into the office and a copy of the Sentinel marked up in red ink was on your desk. But, for the most part, it was a beatdown!!
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 16 2009 @ 6:38AM@Former editor: Meh. Most of the editors I met there were former reporters caught up in the drip-drip-drip of daily stories, the exact sort of stuff that ONE reporter can easily do for three papers. (Looks like they're finally wising up; Bob Lamendola's piece on Weston food poisoning ran in both the SS and Herald)
re: ass kicking: That depended on the editor. Some editors were fine to take a hit on a meaningless daily if you were working on a bigger take for the weekend. These are the kinds of stories "Post in the 90s" is mentioning.
re: clean up: Yikes. I'd say it was usually the other way around. Most of the editors I met there were nice folks and good reporters with excellent sources. They had a great sense of what was happening on their former beats. Good institutional memory. At best, they were mediocre writers. Some were comically bad.
I had a good relationship with the copy desk in FTL and always called them directly for readbacks on stories I cared about. On a few occasions, I ended up driving down to FTL on Friday night and buying copy deskers drinks for last-minute fixes to butchered copy.
Posted On: Tuesday, Jun. 16 2009 @ 10:07AM













