The Broward Palm Beach Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Blogroll

California Blogs

Contact The Pulp

Florida Authors

JournoSites

Newspapers

IRS Slammed Judge Larry With Tax Bill

Thu Jul 05, 2007 at 12:18:20 PM

A look at Judge Larry Seidlin's financial disclosure forms not only shows that he never reported any gifts from wealthy widow Barbara Kasler, but they also reveal that the feds hit him for $11,000 in taxes and penalties for allegedly failing to report profits he made from stocks in 2004.

The IRS notified Seidlin of the apparent oversight in a letter this past September 11, informing the judge that it had learned from a third party that he'd earned $27,763 from stocks he owned in a Boca Raton company called JAG Media Holdings, Inc. Seidlin included the "Notice of Deficiency," as it's called, in his latest financial disclosure, which he filed on June 5.

He lists his net worth on the disclosure at $1.2 million (up from $710,000 in 2002), with assets including his Marine Tower condo and a house in Pennsylvania. A look at five years worth of disclosures and income tax returns also shows that, in 2003, the same year Kasler signed over an empty lot in Palm Bay to his wife, a $135,000 equity loan from the previous year disappeared from Seidlin's debts.

Not trying to relay a lot of meaning here. Just the facts.

After the jump: I Blow Off Some AP-propriate Steam


I mentioned the arrest of Gary Troutman in a post below in a 21-year-old murder case. Elgin Jones, a friend of victim Angela Savage's family, scooped everybody on that, even the BSO media relations office. And just about every media outlet, from newspapers to TV, followed the Broward Times -- yet none credited Jones or his publication.

What bunk. I have a similar complaint regarding the Seidlin story. All across the state and country, the Seidlin gifts story has been reported, yet only the Sun-Sentinel, whose coverage has been lame at best (certainly inferior to the Miami Herald, for instance), has been cited. Why? Because the Associated Press issued an imprecise and poorly written story on the matter.

The AP's Kelli Kennedy lazily wrote that the investigation was sparked by a "newspaper article." You'd think a news organization largely based on disseminating other newspapers' work would bother to accurately and specifically source their reports, especially the original source.

But you have to read the story to understand how bad it really is, sourcing notwithstanding. Here's the top:

The Broward State Attorney's Office asked Gov. Charlie Crist Monday to launch an independent investigation into allegations of impropriety against the judge who presided in the dispute over Anna Nicole Smith's remains.

The state attorney's office said it received a complaint from a lawyer regarding Circuit Court Judge Larry Seidlin and possible gifts he may have accepted from another attorney who actively represented clients in his court. Another judge was also mentioned in the article for accepting gifts from the same lawyer and the state attorney's office has also asked for an investigation.

The letter to Crist said the possible improprieties were detailed in a newspaper article last week.

Is there an editor at AP?

First off, to nit-pick a little, the state attorney's office can't "say" anything. It's an office.

Second, she cites "the article" before she explains to the reader that it exists.

Third, "possible gifts he may have accepted" may possibly be qualification overkill.

Fourth, the use of the term "actively represented" would make any decent copy editor actively cringe.

Fifth, "Another judge was also mentioned in the article for accepting gifts from the same lawyer and the state attorney's office has also asked for an investigation" is an abomination of a sentence.

And that's just the first three graphs.

Okay, I'm done. Just needed to get that out of my system.

Category:

5 Comments:

avid reader says:

She was the editor of the Boca News and that rag has gone down hill ever since with censorship of any releases they do not want to print.

dude wtf? says:


this blog has way more problems than that story. i couldn't even get past the first sentence.

if the irs can "learn" something, i'd say the state attorney's office can "say" something.

you criticize people for crediting the sun-sentinel, then critize her for not?

"this past September 11." There hasn't been another one yet. (not to nit-pick, but you're really kind of retarded)

Pulp says:

This is an interactive blog -- you have to really work to make sense of it. I don't pretend that it upholds the journalistic standards of the written newspaper. Hell, 90 percent of it couldn't exist if it wasn't spit out in 25 seconds. It's not like it gets picked up by half the newspapers in the state as soon as I post it or anything.

But don't kid yourself, dwtf, that you're a master of clarity or good sense, either. There's a difference between the IRS learning something and the state attorney's office saying something. The IRS form letter to Seidlin was unsigned, beginning with, "We have determined ...". The IRS is kind of like that, you know, big nameless faceless etc. It refers to itself in the third person numerous times in the letter. And it did notify Seidlin that it had learned he hadn't reported the 27 grand in income.

The AP, however, could have easily cited Ron Ishoy. Or better yet simply wrote: "Miami Attorney Jack Thompson sent a complaint to prosecutors ...". The Thompson letter was available to the media and it's posted online at Jaablog.

On your other points, I never criticized people for crediting the Sentinel and I didn't criticize Kennedy for not. And there have actually been five September 11s since the one you're talking about. And this past one was September 11, 2006, the date the IRS letter was sent.

Then you go off and throw around a word that a lot of people find offensive at the end there. I'm not saying you can't use it, just that if you do make sure it's worth it. In this case, perhaps in your case in general, it's not.

Now, this bit of ridiculousness only took five times longer than than it did to write the original post.

Terry Spencer says:

I'm the Florida news editor at the AP and I will take the blame for any errors that appear on my wire. And unlike others here, I will use my own name.

That said, Bob, you have an error here: "You'd think a news organization largely based on disseminating other newspapers' work would bother to accurately and specifically source their reports, especially the original source."

The vast majority of AP stories today are original reporting -- about 90 percent. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to correct your mistake.


Pulp says:

I want to thank you, Terry, but I don't think there's an error here. No one outside of the AP would argue the organization is "largely based" on spreading other newspapers' work. I certainly don't argue, though, that the AP is doing more and more independent reporting or that it's good to see.

In fact, I think the AP has improved dramatically during the past 15 years or so in terms of writing, with a few exceptions (see above). In fact, if you look at my latest post, I point out that the AP had more courage than the Post today in reporting a particularly heinous rape in West Palm Beach. All I ask is that the AP cite the source of stories broken by other publications, even if it is an altweekly that doesn't belong to the AP. That's all.

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




Broward Palm Beach Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff