Should We Look Forward to Pink Floyd's New Album?

Categories: Music News

Sayre Berman

When news trickled out last week that Pink Floyd was releasing a new album in October titled The Endless River, you couldn't help but get giddy.

For at least two generations, the British band was the soundtrack for a simpler time when you could pontificate complex subjects like the meaning of their lyrics. Was "Us and Them" about people who have been turned on to drugs and those who haven't? And was "Comfortably Numb" about how society eventually domesticates us all? Most important, was Dark Side of the Moon really recorded to be in sync with The Wizard of Oz, right down to the heartbeats matching when Dorothy puts her ear to the Tin Man's chest?

Before getting too excited about more Pink Floyd, remember the year is 2014.

Original members Syd Barrett and keyboardist Richard Wright are dead, and except for one Live Aid reunion, Roger Waters hasn't had anything to do with Pink Floyd since 1985. Guitarist David Gilmour and drummer Nick Mason, the two remaining members, are old, rich, and probably several decades removed from experimenting with psychedelics.

Still, it's more Pink Floyd.

But we've been burned by the heroes of our teenage years reunions so many times. While these classic acts are generally worth seeing when they perform live, it's when they release new material years after from their formative era that things get dodgy. I'm still trying to recover from last year's onslaught of Pixies EPs. But listening to Indie Cindy brought an epiphany on why new works from favorite broken-up bands of yesteryear are inevitably disappointing. It wasn't a new Pixies album from 2013 that you longed for; it's a lost album from 1989 you want to hear. Something new that sounds like something old.

Which is good news for Floyd fans. Its new album is based on unfinished sessions from "The Division Bell" recording that was supposed to eventually be released as an all-instrumental album titled The Big Spliff. And that's not a joke.

While it's not from the Pink Floyd peak era of 1975, since it's from the early '90s, that means it will feature contributions from the since-deceased Richard Wright. All the vocals and lyrics will be modern-day inventions,; this will not be the Pink Floyd you felt you knew so well, but neither are you the same person who once knew Pink Floyd so well.

New Party Rules for Millennials
Top 20 Sexiest R&B Songs from the '90s to Today
Ten Best Florida Metal Bands of All Time
Ten Most Annoying Drunk Dudes You Meet at a Bar

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail

----------------------> http://w­w­w­.J­o­b­s­7­0­0.­c­o­m


David, you make some good points about how the bands of our youth cannot compete with their best past efforts, especially during their peak eras. Most of us that recall the 70's jokingly refer to it as something that we don't remember due to our drug addled brains. Nowadays we fondly remember things as better than they were. The sound track of our lives from that era means more than the actual events. They will only produce something that most of us shall say merely resembles a Pink Floyd sound. The voices and the styles may be there so that we recognize it but the energy to take it over the top shall only approximate the sound that made them famous in the first place. I doubt that they will even attempt to compete with their past glory. They shall be content to call it a modernization rather than a return to form. It'll have the flavor of the mash potatos but the delicious gravy and secret spices that made it so special shall go missing. Yet, we'll eat it any way without sulking and say to ourselves that it will have to do for it may be our last musical morsel from that legendary band forever. 

Dwayne Clark
Dwayne Clark

Yes! Of course! ...but its just music based off sessions in ' it really isn't that surprising... Its been talked about for years now.


A middlin' Pink Floyd is still prefferable to this boomer than 99% of the new releases I've heard over the last 5 years. Even if you want to consider thus nothing other than than a Gilmour/Mason/Wright jam session, who wouldn't want to sit in on that?


Don't think of this as a Pink Floyd album. Think of it as Rick Wright's last solo album (with some help from his friends). In that case, he** yeah, we should.

Now Trending

Miami Concert Tickets

From the Vault